Validity and Reliability of Seattle Angina Questionnaire Japanese Version in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
Article Outline
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Japanese version (SAQ-J) as a disease-specific health outcome scale in patients with coronary artery disease.
Methods
Patients with coronary artery disease were recruited from a university hospital in Tokyo. The patients completed self-administered questionnaires, and medical information was obtained from the subjects' medical records. Face validity, concurrent validity evaluated using Short Form 36 (SF-36), known group differences, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were statistically analyzed.
Results
A total of 354 patients gave informed consent, and 331 of them responded (93.5%). The concurrent validity was mostly supported by the pattern of association between SAQ-J and SF-36. The patients without chest symptoms showed significantly higher SAQ-J scores than did the patients with chest symptoms in 4 domains. Cronbach's alpha ranged from .51 to .96, meaning that internal consistency was confirmed to a certain extent. The intraclass correlation coefficient of most domains was higher than the recommended value of 0.70. The weighted kappa ranged from .24 to .57, and it was greater than .4 for 14 of the 19 items.
Conclusions
The SAQ-J could be a valid and reliable disease-specific scale in some part for measuring health outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease, and requires cautious use.
Key Words: coronary artery disease , reliability , scale , validity
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
References
- . Angina patients' ratings of current health and health without angina: Associations with severity of angina and comorbidity . Medical Decision Making . 1996;16:169–177
- . Quality of life: The assessment, analysis, and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes . New York: Wiley; 2007;
- . Manual of SF-36, Japanese version1.2 . Kyoto: Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research; 1994;
- . The UK version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-UK): Reliability, validity and responsiveness . Journal of Clinical Epidemiology . 2001;54:907–915
- . Quality of life after coronary revascularization in the elderly . European Heart Journal . 2006;27:1690–1698
- . Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease treated for angina: Validity and reliability of German translations of two specific questionnaires . Quality of Life Research . 2003;12:199–212
- . Rinsho no tameno QOL hyoka handbook . Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin; 2001;
- . Summary of Vital Statistics Web Site . Retrieved August 1, 2009, from http://www.btk.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/data/150/2005/toukeihyou/0005645/t0125160/J0301_001.html 2005;
- Health-related quality of life in Japanese patients with ischemic heart disease: A multicenter cooperative investigation assessed using SF-36 . Journal of Cardiology . 2005;46:211–220
- . Reliability and validity of the Norwegian translation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire following myocardial infarction . Quality of Life Research . 2005;14:883–889
- Prevalence and predictors of angina pectoris one month after myocardial infarction . American Journal of Cardiology . 2006;98:282–288
- Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease . Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 1995;25:333–341
- Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease . New England Journal of Medicine . 2008;359:677–687
PII: S1976-1317(10)60006-0
doi:10.1016/S1976-1317(10)60006-0
© 2010 Korean Society of Nursing Science. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
