Asian Nursing Research
Volume 3, Issue 1 , Pages 41-48, March 2009

Touch-Screen Computerized Quality-of-Life Assessment for Patients with Cancer

  • Eun-Hyun Lee, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Eun-Hyun Lee, PhD, RN, Ajou University, Graduate School of Public Health, San 5, Wonchon-dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 443-721, South Korea

Received 18 February 2008; received in revised form 18 February 2008; accepted 2 March 2009.

Article Outline

Purpose

To evaluate a computerized self-reported, touch-screen version of the cancer-specific quality-of- life (cC-QOL) questionnaire against the traditional paper-and-pencil version (the pC-QOL) for equivalence, time for completion, user preference and ease of use.

Methods

One hundred and five patients were recruited from a cancer center of a university hospital in South Korea. A randomized crossover design was used, with patients randomly assigned into two groups. Group A patients completed the cC-QOL first while waiting to see a physician, and completed the pC-QOL version of the questionnaire after seeing the physician. Group B patients completed these questionnaires in the reverse order. Subjects were asked about user preference and ease of use. Time taken to complete both versions was measured.

Results

Weighted kappa coefficients of items showed very good to moderate agreement. The time required to complete the cC-QOL did not differ statistically from the pC-QOL. The same proportion of patients preferred both versions. Most patients (94.8%) reported that the cC-QOL was “easy” or “very easy” to complete.

Conclusion

The cC-QOL is the computerized equivalent of the pC-QOL, which is used to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of cancer patients. The cC-QOL can be helpful to oncology nurses and physicians for assessing, collecting, and evaluating their patients' HRQOL scores in busy clinical practices. [Asian Nursing Research 2009;3(1):41–48]

Key Words:  agreement , computerized assessment , health-related quality of life , questionnaire

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Allenby A , Matthews J , Beresford J , McLachlan SA . The application of computer touch-screen technology in screening for psychosocial distress in an ambulatory oncology setting . European Journal of Cancer Care . 2002;11:245–253
  2. Armitage P , Berry G . Further analysis of categorical data: Kappa measure of agreement . In:  Armitage P ,  Berry G editor. Statistical Methods in Medical Research . 3rd ed.. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science; 1995;p. 443–447
  3. Cohen J . Statistical Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences . Rev. ed.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association; 1987;
  4. Drummond HE , Ghosh S , Ferguson A , Brackenridge D , Tiplady B . Electronic quality of life questionnaires: A comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study . Quality of Life Research . 1995;4:21–26
  5. Landis JR , Koch GG . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data . Biometrics . 1977;33:159–174
  6. Lee E-H . Development and psychometric evaluation of a quality of life scale for Korean patients with cancer (C-QOL) . Journal of Korean Society of Nursing Science . 2007;37:324–333
  7. Morris J , Perez D , McNoe B . The use of quality of life data in clinical practice . Quality of Life Research . 1998;7:85–91
  8. Mullen KH , Berry DL , Zierler BK . Computerized symptom and quality of life assessment for patients with cancer part II: Acceptability and usability . Oncology Nursing Forum . 2004;31:E84–89
  9. Oken M , Creech R , Tormey D , Horton J , Davis TE , McFadden ET , et al.   Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group . American Journal of Clinical Oncology . 1982;5:649–655
  10. Pocock SJ . Clinical Trials . Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1983;
  11. Pouwer F , Snoek FJ , van der Ploeg HM , Heine RJ , Brand AN . A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-Being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) . Quality of Life Research . 1998;7:33–38
  12. Ryan JM , Corry JR , Attewell R , Smithson MJ . A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version . Quality of Life Research . 2002;11:19–26
  13. Velikova G , Wright EP , Smith AB , Cull A , Gould A , Forman D , et al.   Automated collection of quality of life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaire . Journal of Clinical Oncology . 1999;17:998–1007

PII: S1976-1317(09)60015-3

doi:10.1016/S1976-1317(09)60015-3

Asian Nursing Research
Volume 3, Issue 1 , Pages 41-48, March 2009

Article Tools