Asian Nursing Research
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 68-82, June 2007

Thinking in Clinical Nursing Practice: A Study of Critical Care Nurses' Thinking Applying the Think-Aloud, Protocol Analysis Method

  • Kyung-Ja Han, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Kyung-Ja Han, RN, PhD, Professor, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongro-gu, Seoul, 110-799, Korea
  • ,
  • Hesook Suzie Kim, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
  • ,
  • Mae-Ja Kim, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Kyung-Ja Hong, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Sungae Park, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Soon-Nyoung Yun, RN, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Professor, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Misoon Song, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Yoenyi Jung, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Haewon Kim, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Kwandong University, Gangreung, Gangwon do, Korea
  • ,
  • Dong-Oak Debbie Kim, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, College of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Korea
  • ,
  • Heejung Choi, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Konkuk University, Chungju, Chungbuk, Korea
  • ,
  • Kyungae Kim, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Article Outline

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to discover the patterns and processes of decision-making in clinical nursing practice.

Methods

A set of think-aloud data from five critical care nurses during 40 to 50 minutes of caregiving in intensive care units were obtained and analyzed by applying the procedures recommended by Ericsson and Simon for protocol analysis.

Results

Four thinking processes before acting were identified to constitute various sorts of thoughts in which the nurses were engaged during patient care: reviewing, validation, consideration, rationalization, and action. In addition, three patterns of sequential streaming of thinking (short, intermediate, long) were identified to reveal various ways the nurses dealt with clinical situations involving nursing tasks and responsibilities.

Conclusion

This study specifies the initial categories of thoughts for each of the processes and various patterns with which these processes are sequentially combined, providing insights into the ways nurses think about problems and address their concerns. The findings suggest that the thinking in clinical practice involves more than focused decision-making and reasoning, and needs to be examined from a broader perspective.

Key Words:  clinical practice nursing research , critical care , nurses , thinking

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Azzarello J . Knowledge structure and problem representations: How do novice and expert home care nurses compare? . Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research . 2003;4:26
  2. Benner P . From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice . Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1984;
  3. Buckingham CD , Adams A . Classifying clinical decision making: A unifying approach . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 2000;32:981–989
  4. Buckingham CD , Adams A . Classifying clinical decision making: Interpreting nursing intuition, heuristics and medical diagnosis . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 2000;32:990–998
  5. Bucknall T , Thomas S . Clinical decision-making in critical care . Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing . 1995;13:10–17
  6. Bucknall T . The clinical landscape of critical care: Nurses' decision-making . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 2003;43:310–319
  7. Chi MTH . Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide . The Journal of the Learning Sciences . 1997;6:271–315
  8. Christie LA . Expertise in nurses' clinical judgments: The role of cognitive variables and experience. (Doctoral dissertation, The University of British Columbia) . Dissertation Abstracts International B . 1996;57/12:7718
  9. Cioffi J , Markham R . Clinical decision-making by midwives: Managing case complexity . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 1997;25:265–272
  10. Crutcher RJ . Telling what we know: The use of verbal report methodologies in psychological research . Psychological Science . 1994;5:241–244
  11. de la Cruz FA . Clinical decision-making styles of home healthcare nurses . Journal of Nursing Scholarship . 1994;26:222–226
  12. Ellefsen B , Kim HS , Han KJ . Nursing gaze as framework for nursing practice: A study from acute care settings in Korea, Norway and the USA . Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences . 2007;21:98–104
  13. In:  Elstein AS ,  Shulman LS ,  Sprafka SA editor. Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978;
  14. Ericsson KA , Simon HA . Verbal reports as data . Psychological Review . 1980;87:215–251
  15. Ericsson KA , Simon HA . Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data . Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press; 1984;
  16. Ericsson KA , Simon HA . Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data . Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press; 1993;
  17. Ericsson KA , Simon HA . How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking . Mind, Culture, and Activity . 1998;5:178–186
  18. Fowler LP . Clinical reasoning strategies used during care planning . Clinical Nursing Research . 1997;6:349–361
  19. In:  Gilovich T ,  Griffin D ,  Kahneman D editor. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002;
  20. Greenwood J , Sullivan J , Spence K , McDonald M . Nursing scripts and the organizational influences on critical thinking: Report of a study of neonatal nurses' clinical reasoning . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 2000;31:1106–1114
  21. Hamers JPH , Abu-Saad HH , Halfens RJG . Diagnostic process and decision making in nursing: A literature review . Journal of Professional Nursing . 1994;10:154–163
  22. Harbison J . Clinical decision making in nursing: Theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 2001;35:126–133
  23. Henry SB , LeBreck DB , Holzemer WL . The effect of verbalization of cognitive processes on clinical decision making . Research in Nursing & Health . 1989;12:187–193
  24. Hicks FD , Merritt SL , Elstein AS . Critical thinking and clinical decision making in critical care nursing: A pilot study . Heart & Lung . 2003;32:169–180
  25. Higuchi KAS , Donald JG . Thinking processes used by nurses in clinical decision making . Journal of Nursing Education . 2002;41:145–153
  26. Hughes J , Parkes S . Trends in the use of verbal protocol analysis in software engineering research . Behavior & Information Technology . 2003;22:127–140
  27. In:  Kahneman D ,  Slovic P ,  Tversky A editor. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982;
  28. Kim HS . Putting theory into practice: Problems and prospects . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 1993;18:1632–1639
  29. Kremer MJ , Faut-Callahan M , Hicks FD . A study of clinical decision making by certified registered nurse anesthetists . American Association of Nursing Anesthetists Journal . 2002;70:391–397
  30. Lee A , Pennington N . The effects of paradigm on cognitive activities in design . International Journal of Human-Computer Studies . 1994;40:577–601
  31. Marshall SP . Schemas in problem solving . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995;
  32. Newall A , Simon HA . Human problem solving . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1972;
  33. Offredy M . Decision-making in primary care: outcomes from a study using patient scenarios . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 2002;40:532–541
  34. Payne JW . Thinking aloud: Insights into information processing . Psychological Science . 1994;5:241, 245–248
  35. Redden M , Wotton K . Clinical decision making by nurses when faced with third-space fluid shift: How well do they fare? . Gastroenterology Nursing . 2001;24:182–191
  36. Rew L . Intuition in critical care nursing practice . Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing . 1990;9:30–37
  37. Ritter BJ . An analysis of expert nurse practitioners' diagnostic reasoning. (Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco) . Dissertation Abstracts International-A . 2000;61/04:1279
  38. Ritter BJ . An analysis of expert nurse practitioners' diagnostic reasoning . Journal of American Academy of Nurse Practitioners . 2003;15:137–141
  39. Simmons B , Lanuza D , Fonteyn M , Hicks F , Holm K . Clinical reasoning in experienced nurses . Western Journal of Nursing Research . 2003;25:701–724
  40. Thompson C . A conceptual treadmill: the need for ‘middle ground’ in clinical decision making theory in nursing . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 1999;30:1222–1229
  41. Thompson C . Journal of Advanced Nursing Forum: Clinical decision making in nursing: Theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice–a response to Jean Harbison . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 2001;35:134–137
  42. Watson S . An exploratory study into a methodology for the examination of decision making by nurses in the clinical area . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 1994;20:351–360
  43. White JE , Nativio DG , Kobert SN , Engberg SJ . Content and process in clinical decision-making by nurse practitioners . Journal of Nursing Scholarship . 1992;24:153–158
  44. Wilson TD . The proper protocol: Validity and completeness of verbal reports . Psychological Science . 1994;5:249–252

PII: S1976-1317(08)60010-9

doi:10.1016/S1976-1317(08)60010-9

Asian Nursing Research
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 68-82, June 2007